Sending wrong signal on cannabis use

There are good reasons for Singapore’s drug laws. SportSG’s decision on national swimmers who took controlled drugs overseas suggests muddled thinking and risks undermining our zero-tolerance stance on drug abuse.

There is the dangerous view that the “recreational” use of cannabis is harmless, and that one would not get addicted to it. PHOTO: AFP
New: Gift this subscriber-only story to your friends and family

The extraterritorial reach of Singapore laws has come in for debate recently following the admission by three national swimmers that they had consumed controlled drugs while abroad. Among the issues raised: Is it a case of over-reach by Singapore authorities to apply domestic laws, in this instance the Misuse of Drugs Act (MDA), in such a manner? More broadly, what considerations go into determining Singapore's drug laws? Should international standards apply when they are at odds with our laws?

First, the MDA is not the only domestic law that treats acts done abroad as if they had been committed within Singapore. Other examples include the Prevention of Corruption Act and the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act.

Already a subscriber? 

Read the full story and more at $9.90/month

Get exclusive reports and insights with more than 500 subscriber-only articles every month

Unlock these benefits

  • All subscriber-only content on ST app and straitstimes.com

  • Easy access any time via ST app on 1 mobile device

  • E-paper with 2-week archive so you won't miss out on content that matters to you

Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.